GCP ACE Drill: Cloud Run Cold Start Optimization - The Minimum Instances Trade-off

While preparing for the Google Cloud Associate Cloud Engineer (ACE), many candidates get confused by Cloud Run performance optimization. In the real world, this is fundamentally a decision about balancing serverless cost efficiency with user experience expectations. Let’s drill into a simulated scenario.

The Scenario

#

You’re the cloud engineer for StreamlineEdu, an online learning platform serving approximately 400 students across multiple time zones. The platform’s main application runs on Cloud Run, hosting interactive course dashboards and video content delivery. Recently, your support team has received complaints from students reporting that when they first log into the platform each day, the initial dashboard takes 8-12 seconds to load, but subsequent page navigations are fast (under 2 seconds).

The application serves sporadic traffic patterns—peak usage during morning hours (7-9 AM) and evening study sessions (7-10 PM), with minimal activity during mid-day and overnight. Your CTO wants to improve the user experience while adhering to Google Cloud’s recommended practices for serverless deployments.

Key Requirements

#

Reduce the initial page load time for users accessing the Cloud Run application while following Google’s best practices for Cloud Run configuration.

The Options

#

• A) Set the minimum number of instances for your Cloud Run service to 3.
• B) Set the concurrency number to 1 for your Cloud Run service.
• C) Set the maximum number of instances for your Cloud Run service to 100.
• D) Update your web application to use the protocol HTTP/2 instead of HTTP/1.1.

Correct Answer

#

Option A.

The Architect’s Analysis

#

Correct Answer

#

Option A: Set the minimum number of instances for your Cloud Run service to 3.

Step-by-Step Winning Logic

#

The scenario describes a classic cold start problem in serverless computing. When Cloud Run scales to zero instances during idle periods, the first request after inactivity must wait for a new container instance to start, which includes:

• Container image pull
• Application initialization
• Runtime environment setup

Google’s recommended approach for mitigating cold starts when user experience is critical is to configure minimum instances. This keeps a specified number of container instances “warm” and ready to serve requests immediately, eliminating the cold start delay entirely.

For the described scenario (few hundred users, sporadic traffic), setting minimum instances to 3 provides:

• Immediate response capacity for the first users in each traffic wave
• Headroom for concurrent requests during traffic spikes
• Cost predictability with a manageable baseline expense

This aligns with Google’s guidance: “Use minimum instances when you need to reduce the number of cold starts or when your application must handle traffic immediately.”

The Trap (Distractor Analysis)

#

Why not Option B (Set concurrency to 1)?

• Concurrency controls how many simultaneous requests a single instance handles
• Setting it to 1 means each instance serves only one request at a time
• This worsens the problem by forcing more instance starts, increasing cold start frequency
• Google recommends higher concurrency values (default is 80) to maximize instance utilization
• This is a “noise” option that confuses instance lifecycle with request handling

Why not Option C (Set maximum instances to 100)?

• Maximum instances control the upper scaling limit, not cold start behavior
• This prevents runaway scaling and cost overruns but doesn’t keep instances warm
• It addresses a different problem (cost protection during traffic spikes)
• The first user after idle periods still experiences cold starts
• This is a classic “wrong dimension” distractor

Why not Option D (Use HTTP/2 instead of HTTP/1.1)?

• HTTP/2 provides benefits like request multiplexing and header compression
• These improve performance for established connections, not initial connection setup
• Cloud Run already supports HTTP/2 by default in most configurations
• This doesn’t address the container initialization delay (the actual cold start)
• Protocol changes are application-level optimizations, not infrastructure-level solutions to cold starts

The Architect Blueprint

#

Diagram Note: With minimum instances configured, Cloud Run maintains 3 pre-warmed containers that instantly serve incoming requests, eliminating the 8-12 second cold start delay students were experiencing.

CLI/Console Operations (ACE Focus)

#

Setting Minimum Instances via gcloud CLI

#

# Deploy Cloud Run service with minimum instances
gcloud run deploy streamline-edu-app \
  --image gcr.io/project-id/edu-platform:v1.2 \
  --region us-central1 \
  --min-instances 3 \
  --max-instances 20 \
  --concurrency 80 \
  --memory 512Mi \
  --cpu 1

Updating Existing Service

#

# Update only the minimum instances parameter
gcloud run services update streamline-edu-app \
  --region us-central1 \
  --min-instances 3

Console Navigation

#

1. Navigate to Cloud Run in the GCP Console
2. Select your service (streamline-edu-app)
3. Click “Edit & Deploy New Revision”
4. Expand “Container, Variables & Secrets, Connections, Security”
5. Go to “Capacity” section
6. Set “Minimum number of instances” to 3
7. Click “Deploy”

Verification Command

#

# Check current configuration
gcloud run services describe streamline-edu-app \
  --region us-central1 \
  --format="value(spec.template.metadata.annotations.'autoscaling.knative.dev/minScale')"

Real-World Practitioner Insight

#

Exam Rule

#

“For the ACE exam, when you see Cloud Run + slow initial load times + subsequent pages fast, immediately think cold start problem and select the option that mentions minimum instances. This is Google’s documented best practice for this exact scenario.”

Real World

#

In production environments, the decision is more nuanced:

When to use minimum instances:

• User-facing applications where first-impression latency is critical
• SLA requirements guarantee sub-second response times
• Predictable baseline traffic justifies the continuous cost
• Applications with expensive initialization (large frameworks, ML model loading)

When to accept cold starts:

• Internal tools with forgiving users
• Batch processing or webhook handlers where latency isn’t critical
• Very low traffic volumes where minimum instance costs exceed value
• Development/staging environments

Hybrid approaches:

• Use Cloud Scheduler to send periodic “keep-alive” requests during business hours
• Implement faster cold start through application optimization (smaller images, lazy loading)
• Consider Cloud Run Jobs for truly asynchronous workloads
• Use startup CPU boost (minimum instances + startup CPU boost for faster cold starts)

Cost Reality Check: For StreamlineEdu’s 400 users, 3 minimum instances with 512Mi memory at ~$0.0000024/vCPU-second and ~$0.0000025/GiB-second costs approximately:

• $35-45/month baseline (always-on cost)
• Compare to: potential user churn from poor experience, customer support costs, or alternative solutions like keeping GKE cluster running ($70+/month minimum)

The investment is defensible from both user experience and total cost of ownership perspectives.